Carson was Right!
In the past I was of the opinion that Sir Edward Carson’s opposition to the Irish Home Rule Bill, and his raising of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) to resist such a measure, was an act of rebellion against the civil magistrate. This is a view I have subsequently revised. Why? Firstly, because Lord Carson (as he later became) was not a private individual; he and his other Unionist MPs were lesser magistrates, and so their resistance to a parliamentary bill – which would have placed Ulster Protestants under Popish despotism – was not an act of anarchy. Romans 13:1 says ‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities’, however, since Lord Carson and others were one branch of ‘the governing authorities’ then they were not guilty of ungodly rebellion.
The Reformers such as John Calvin and John Knox recognised that the lesser magistrates had the right to resist (and, if necessary, remove) superior civil magistrates when they abused their power. An example of this in Scripture is found in when the northern tribes of Israel seceded from Rehoboam’s rule after petitioning him to cease from his tyrannical oppression of them (1 Kings 12). Lord Carson’s threat to set up a provisional civil government to rule over Ulster if the Home Rule bill was passed was, in essence, no different.
But was Carson right to set up the UVF? First of all, let me say that the UVF which was established in 1912 has nothing to do with the bunch of drug-pushers, murderers and atheistic Socialists that presently call themselves the “UVF”. However, getting back on topic, the idea of a citizen militia – controlled by the lesser magistrate – is a perfectly Scriptural one; as the laws governing warfare in Deuteronomy 20 do not allow for a standing army, but only a citizen militia of volunters. This is much less dangerous than a standing army, kept separate from the civilian population, as there is nothing to stop the civil government from using such an army to oppress the very people that they are supposed to be protecting (the US Army’s confiscation of citizen’s weapons during the recent hurricane Katrina disaster bears testimony to this). Moreover, if all guns are kept in the hands of the police and army, then that means the state has a monopoly on weapons – which it can readily use against us.
So, in conclusion, I have come to see that Lord Carson and those who stood with him were not insurrectionists, but men who sought to use their God-appointed authority to stop despotism. If only more righteous magistrates would be raised up to resist all forms of Popish, Erastian, Socialist and Messianic Statist tryanny.

March 19, 2008 at 8:24 am
This is one reason why I believe the Southern U.S. states were right to seceed and form a new nation. Each State drew up articles of secession and held a vote. I recently read Calvin’s section on this in the Institues. Good work brother!
March 19, 2008 at 7:46 pm
I don’t know about this. How far (low) are you willing to take it; would it be acceptable for the city council to resist in this manner?
March 19, 2008 at 9:38 pm
Yes it would; since they are elected lesser magistrates.
March 21, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Very interesting thoughts Daniel. If you want a tenouos connection between the UVF and the RPs …
Barry Galbraith once told me that 2 UVF guns from 1916 were found in the attic of Milford Manse when it was being renovated!! It was thought they had never been used though!
March 21, 2008 at 8:49 pm
2 guns, that is 1 each for Mark Loughridge’s daughters to use…could come in handy.
March 27, 2008 at 3:21 pm
[...] more on the right of lesser magistrates to resist, readers may benefit from this post on my blog: Carson was Right! « Reformed Covenanter After reading this you should purchase my [...]