Reformed Christian Education: Is It Isolationist?
Christians (like myself) who call upon fellow believers to remove their children from pagan state schools (even if they are sprinkled with a little bit of Christianity), and to immerse them in a throughly Christian and Reformed system of educational training, are often portrayed by those in the Reformed faith (who wish to ignore God’s word as it applies to education) as promoting some sort of ‘new monasticism’ by encouraging Christian parents to take their offspring out of the world. Yet anyone who has ever taken the time to read books by Reformed authors on Christian shooling and Home education knows that nothing could be further from the truth. Before totally misrepresenting other people, Reformed educational autonomists should question their own motives for rejecting Christian education. Have they come to this position as a result of honest and objective exegesis of Scripture, or is it because they are too lazy and unwilling to fulfill their God-given responsibilities? – and so, they choose instead to sacrifice their children on the altars of humanistic education (remember that secular humanists regard state schools as their church’s).
The reality, however, is that Reformed education (particualary if guided by the positive aspects of Christian Reconstruction) seeks to train covenant children, not to withdraw from the world like ascetics, but to ‘fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth’ (Gen. 1:28). Reformed education is not, like Fundamentalist education a mere withdrawal from pagan state schools, but Biblical training for the covenant child in which he is taught to bring all things into subjection to Christ’s Lordship. Every subject, whether it be science, economics, political theory, history, philosophy etc., is to be taught from an explicitly Christian and Biblical standpoint so that the covenant child will bring ‘every though into captivity to the obedience of Christ’ (2 Cor. 10:5 NKJV). State education, on the other hand, does not train children to serve the Lord, but instead to be good Social Democrats, submissive to the egalitarian, socialist and humanistic laws of the false god which is the modern totalitarian state. The goal of Refomed education however, is to train up children in the ways of Lord so that they will be equipped to serve Him, and bring everything into subjection to Him, in their calling as adults.
Our aim as promoters of Reformed Christian education is not to flee into isolation, but to advance Christ’s Kingdom on the earth. State education, with its heathen, anti-Christian, egalitarian, statist, socialist and humanistic agenda is ultimately out to destroy the Kingdom of God, and erect a man-made utopia on earth. Consequently, Christians who send their children to its schools are clearly playing into the hands of the Secularists and Statists as they are failing to train their children to exercise dominion under God, and, in turn, promoting the deification of the modern state.
It is time for Reformed Christians to awake out of their pietistic slumber, stop making excuses, and start obeying God’s word; which, in practical terms, means removing their children from state schools and giving them a properly Christian education
December 8, 2006 at 2:21 pm
That’s right. I am ever thankful God never permitted me to place my children in state school. I believe it do be an abrogation of responsiblity on the part of the parents to do so.
Let me ask you this… Should a man who allows his children to attend state or public run schools be qualified to serve in church office? Or is he neglecting his oversight of his family and therefore showing himself disqualified for office?
December 8, 2006 at 3:36 pm
Thanks for your comment David. With regards to your question, it is my conviction that a man who sends his children to a state school is unfit to hold office in Christ’s church because if he ‘does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church’ (1 Tim. 3:5). Moreover, if a man is prepared to pragmatically set aside God’s word on education, will he not do the same with regards to worship, church discipline etc. ?
December 8, 2006 at 4:37 pm
Good thoughts and they seem to reflect my own.
December 8, 2006 at 5:50 pm
Excellent summary of education. Interesting points on church office. I will have to chew on that for a bit.
Also, your posts on the Regulative Principle are very intriguing. Many here in the states would not even consider it as a possibility. Great posts…
December 8, 2006 at 10:17 pm
You have good thoughts here, keep it up!
BD
December 9, 2006 at 10:08 am
I agree wholeheartedly with your comments Daniel. Unfortunately because so many in the UK use the ‘isolationist’ argument, it perpetuates the problem for the few homeschooling families to avoid being isolated. The thing that gets me is that Christians can be so (mistakenly) concerned that their children might be ’social misfits’ in a pagan society, and yet their concern at putting them into state school does not does not even begin to compare with the former concern.
As for the comments on men, the education of their children and holding office, while you present an ideal position, I do not think it would be proper in the current religious climate in the UK to apply this. Education is required to bring about this Reformation. Furthermore most Reformed ministers and elders in the UK would need to be deposed from office.
December 9, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Yes, I admit that the position on elders is an ideal, in the present climate it is not going to be possible to implement this.
December 9, 2006 at 3:41 pm
I have to ask, I’m not trying to be divisive, but the “ideal position”? I believe we have to stand firm upon our understanding of the Word regardless of the temporal or practical implications. And though I don’t believe being rash is the solution, if we are convinced the Word teaches men must not hand over their children to Baal to be educated, the church must manifest this in it’s orthopraxy.
Does this not open a door whereby we can merely set biblical principles aside saying, “Well, that’s just the ideal position”? I fear, if we aren’t fighting where the battle rages, and it is raging for the hearts and minds of our covenant children, we aren’t fighting at all. And if this means deposing men who don’t meet this critria for church office, then give me 10 men committed to thoroughly living out God’s Word, than a 1000 living otherwise.
December 9, 2006 at 4:00 pm
Not being a church officer at the moment David, it is not possible for me to implement my views on this subject, so to that extent it remains an ideal. However, if I was an elder then I would have to use my position of influence to ensure that this ideal was implemented.
December 9, 2006 at 4:00 pm
Oh yes, did you get the books David?
December 9, 2006 at 4:12 pm
Yes I did, thank you for sending them. Have you looked at Xulon yet?
December 9, 2006 at 4:18 pm
Yes David it was very helpful and I am seriously considering using them, my only worry is distribution in the UK, but they seem to have an international distribution option so hopefully this won’t be too much of a problem.
December 19, 2006 at 1:18 am
Great arguments defending explicitly Christian education!
I personally believe that it should be an excommunicable offense if one doesn’t repent from sending their covenant children to a public school. Such socialism is a modern day heresy. Though there might also be a problem with the teaching aspect of the church if such an extreme discipline really became necessary to implement.